The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish relationship with client
|
|
A range of communication and interpersonal skills are used to establish the knowledge level of client and clarify the level of insurance broking advice to be provided Completed |
Evidence:
|
Broker authorisation to deal with the client’s needs is established and referral to appropriate adviser for higher level/specialist advice made, if required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Enquiries are responded to by explaining the range of general insurance products and broking services available and their relevant fee and charging methodology Completed |
Evidence:
|
Role of the broker and the licensee/principal responsible for the adviser’s conduct is advised to the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify client objectives and risk situation
|
|
Regulations, codes and procedures set out in organisation compliance manuals for the personal advice process are complied with including delivery of appropriate disclosure documents and information about complaints handling processes Completed |
Evidence:
|
A range of communication and interpersonal skills are used to establish client objectives and goals Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine submission resource requirements
|
|
Nature of submission required by prospective client is determined Completed |
Evidence:
|
Skill requirements to prepare submission are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
The need for specialist advice or client industry information is sought if required to address issues that professional judgement indicates may require further consideration Completed |
Evidence:
|
Consultants with required skills are identified and retained as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Team is established with team leader identified as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply risk assessment methodology
|
|
Appropriate risk assessment processes and tools are used to collect relevant personal, financial and business details Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk assessment is completed in compliance with guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
Comprehensive records are maintained of risk assessment and actions taken Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse client risk information
|
|
All information from the client risk assessment process is analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Comprehensive records of risks assessed and actions taken are checked to ensure information is current and comprehensive Completed |
Evidence:
|
Required insurance program and/or products are fully identified using an appropriate checklist Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clients are consulted throughout the analysis for further clarification where necessary Completed |
Evidence:
|
Follow up questioning to ensure that the client understood earlier questions and that information received by them is relevant and complete is undertaken Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify appropriate insurance program
|
|
Appropriate insurance/risk management program based on risk assessment and client needs is determined Completed |
Evidence:
|
Proposed program is compared with appropriate checklist and other similar clients and significant changes identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Available options are identified and assessed using information from risk analysis Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant product research is conducted Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advice for presentation to the client is prepared in accordance with organisational policy Completed |
Evidence:
|
Checks to ensure the advice has been scaled and suitable to the requirements of the advice situation are made Completed |
Evidence:
|
Checks that restricted words are used appropriately in the delivery of advice are made Completed |
Evidence:
|
Checks are made that the reasoning behind the advice and any conflicts of interest that affect the advice have been disclosed are made Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify market availability
|
|
Where applicable, availability of a market with suitable terms for the client requirements is identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Where applicable, indicative terms of cover are sourced with insurers to provide the most beneficial outcome for the prospective client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Make submission to prospective client
|
|
Required written submission is provided to client in format required by the organisation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Options that specify benefits and advantages are identified for the prospective client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Features of the advice are explained to the client in a clear and unambiguous way Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant details, terms and conditions of the underlying products/services are explained to the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Requirements to put the recommended program into effect are explained to the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Client is provided with written supporting documentation and guided through the key aspects of the documentation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Distribution of relevant disclosure documents is established Completed |
Evidence:
|